Jan. 10, 2007
Creating a Peaceful, Independent and Harmonious Japan


The renewal of Japanese politics must start with the repudiation of "Koizumi politics." The most important thing at the moment is the thorough critiquing of Koizumi's approach. The former prime minister's goal of Americanizing Japan will lead this nation down the road to ruin. And rejection of that goal is the first step on the path to a reborn, healthy Japan. But Prime Minister Abe's LDP- Komeito ruling coalition can't take this step. A big opportunity for political change in Japan is approaching.

"Peace is the only moral value that matters in the pursuit of truth. But human society has only known the morality of oppression and resignation." ? Romain Rolland

For a five-and-a-half year span from spring 2001 to autumn 2006, Japan's mass media hyped and supported the Koizumi administration in a way that resembles the Cultural Revolution of Mao Zedong, which swept through China in the 1960s and 70s. The Japanese people joined in the frenzied dance of adulation.
Mao's Cultural Revolution brought about the huge fantasy of Mao- style Communism, and the Chinese people joined in the dance of social destruction. The Koizumi Cultural Revolution's goal was to Americanize Japan. Or more precisely, it was to bring about Republican-style Americanization of Japan.
The true leader of the Koizumi Cultural Revolution was US President George W. Bush. Koizumi tried to remodel Japan into a country that embraced Bush's Republican-style politics. The former prime minister was supported in his efforts by the Liberal Democratic Party, New Komeito, government officials, the financial sector and the mass media.
In my view, Koizumi was the most irresponsible and frivolous prime minister in Japan's postwar history. The former premier took a stable Japan and destroyed it; and after it had collapsed, he simply walked away. Now the Cabinet of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is left to shoulder the giant burden left behind by Koizumi politics. For the Abe Cabinet to reverse Koizumi's burdensome legacy, it needs to repudiate the very politics that brought the legacy about. But the Abe Cabinet can't do this because Abe's political power was created by Koizumi, and the new prime minister is seen as Koizumi's successor.
Prime Minister Abe's stance is similar to that of Taira no Shigemori, son of Taira no Kiyomori, as recorded in Rai San’y?'s Nihon Gaishi (An Unofficial Japanese History): "If I obey my father, I can't be loyal (to my country); but if I am loyal, I can't obey my father." If Abe is loyal to the people of Japan, he can't possibly continue with the policies fathered by Koizumi. But if Abe decides to break with Koizumi, he would take a beating from a mass media that still foolishly supports the path set by the former prime minister, and inevitably, Abe's support would dwindle. The Abe administration is caught between loyalty to the country and duty to its "father," Koizumi.
This situation presents a huge opportunity for the opposition parties to bring about political change. If the Democratic Party of Japan can corral the other opposition parties into a unified front, political change is possible.

END